Given all the “mysteries” surrounding 9-11, it is necessary to refer to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s philosophy:

“When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains – however improbable – must be the truth.”

But this means proving an infinite amount of things impossible in order to confirm the remainder  --  disproving A never proves B, because there is A2, A3, A4 .... which have not been disproven.

Only when you eliminate the single proposition of "not A" to you prove "A"  -- absurd to check out an alphabet that is infinite, in a process of elimination.

Best you can do is get the hypothesis that withstands all the tests you can think of and which explains, predicts and interprets more than the enxt best theory.

Yet I know he means "Disprove the official story and whatevery you are left with spells high crimes and treason.

Start with certain basics at the Pentagon and Flight 77 – no tail, no wings, and no damage consistent with such a “crash.” Even the Pentagon lawn was undamaged. Seismic monitors don’t reveal anything suggesting such an impact.

Yes, all small pieces, and most of those mere smitherines shards.  Even stuff of two to four feet in length is suspiciously scarce.

Imagine a trans-continental flight with no children, hardly any passengers and no cargo. The flight arrived in the D.C. area unexpectedly, yet there is no record – or even ‘tales’ - of ATC directing aircraft away from the “rogue aircraft,” no ATC warnings, no calls from ATC attempting to establish contact – on any frequency. There were no TCAS alarms with aircraft in a busy terminal area, scattering for clear airspace; with secondary TCAS alarms from the chaos. Certainly, the fighter non-intercept issue is a story, by itself – obscured in the cloud of “national security.”

I wish this knowledgable pilot would explain some of these terms to laymen like me.  (But the fight list does have children aboard, I am sorry to say.)  (List available upon request.)

To the world of the legitimately curious, one’s attention should first go to the photo on the cover of "The Big Lie" - Thierry Meyssan. (The contents of that book is a MUST for any serious American.) There should be no doubt that it's a legitimate photo. It shows, among other things, a lull in the Pentagon fire, just after the initial fiery explosion, illustrated in the Pentagon security video. Among other things, one notices the fire equipment and ambulances standing by - as though waiting for something to happen. How long had they been there? What was going on, that they should wait? What was known?

Not the rescue workers, but the man who gave the hold-back order, Donald Rumsfeld, seems to have been waiting for the anti-Wolfowitz Naval Operations Intelligence personell who were targeted in the attack to be fully dead.  Read this:

>> http://public-action.com/rescue.html
>> According to the Washington Post, January 20, 2002, "The Last Watch,"
>(front
>> page, Style section), the entire chain of command of the super secret
>Chief
>> of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot (CNO-IP) were killed in the
>September
>> 11 attack on the Pentagon.
>>
>> One of the victims was Darin Pontell, who worked in CNO-IP.  The Post
>> reported that two days after the attack, Darin's parents were still
hoping
>> Darin was alive.  Here is an excerpt from "The Last Watch," Washington
>Post,
>> January 20, 2001, pg.F1.
>>
>> "'Where'd I put my cell phone?  Where is it?' Marilyn Pontell, Darrin's
>> mother, grew frantic looking for her purse.  Her Nokia was chiming 'Take
>Me
>> Out to the Ball Game.'
>> "Marilyn would be sick if she missed that call.  Maybe it was news about
>her
>> son.  maybe it was Darin himself.
>>
>> "Two days later, Marilyn and Gary Pontell still hoped their youngest boy
>had
>> been spared.  Gathered at Darin and Devora's apartment in Gaithersburg on
>> Thursday afternoon, they could barely process the idea that he was dead .
>.
>> .
>>
>> "Navy officials gave garbled reports: One person said someone who looked
>> like Darin walked from the scene.  Somebody else claimed he was working
>far
>> away, in the A-Ring.  An officials said they couldn't find his Acura
>Integra
>> in the Pentagon lot . . .
>>
>> "The Nokia sang again, then silence.  Too late.  when she finally got to
>the
>> phone, Marilyn scrolled through the menu.  One missed call: 1:57 p.m.  No
>> message.  But the incoming number was clearly identified.  It was
Darin's.
>>
>> "My God, maybe he was alive.
>>
>> "For five more days, they waited.  On Sept. 18, the Navy informed the
>> Pontells that Darin's body had been positively identified.  His cell
phone
>> was never returned to the family.  They presume it was never found.
>Perhaps
>> the flip-phone had somehow dialed Marilyn's number when the rubble
>shifted.
>> But didn't all cell phones have to be turned off upon entry into the
>CNO-IP
>> [Chief of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot]?
>>
>> "The FBI offered a one-word explanation for that call: 'anomaly.'"
>>
>> body had been positively identified.  His cell phone was never returned
to
>> the family.  They presume it was never found. 

As one views that particular image, there is no doubt that a plane did not hit the Pentagon. The light-poles in the path of the alleged 42-degree path are still standing. There is no hole big enough to swallow a 757. There is no damage from the supposed wings. The occasion of the construction at that site is far too “convenient” to be any form of “coincidence.” Later pictures of the light-poles show them adjacent to their mountings – not propelled forward by the velocity of a jet. Their mounting plates are not damaged from the mounting bolts being “pulled through” from an impact. The poles don’t show any predominant “strike” damage.

All makes sense, except I do have shots with the poles down  --  although in one case the piping is thick and curved and does not match the all straight line poles and extension poles.

No pilot will claim to be able to hit such a spot as the Pentagon base – under any conditions – in a 757 doing 300 knots. As to the clearly amateur Arab pilots: IMPOSSIBLE!

Very easy to take his word for it on this.

In that same photograph, there is another fire going behind one of the most inner rings of the Pentagon. But, the fire is the wrong location for the alleged 42-degree strike. The predominant smoke color in the photo is clearly not that of jet fuel. That will be true in all the photographs of the Pentagon strike – and flight 93, in Pennsylvania, as well. So, what did happen – to any reasonable probability of fact? The answer is quite ugly – to those who believe – or want to believe - in the current American leadership.

This man has knowledge and analysis well beyond mine  --  so glad you shared this with me John!

Most likely, it was a missile – captured by the Pentagon security video camera – hit the Pentagon, at approximately a 90-degree angle. What type of missile & warhead are uncertain. It was most likely fired from a truck in the vicinity of the trees, directly away from the strike point. Its obvious size says that it was not a 757. The imagery is of such quality, that any serious claims of optical aberrations are out of the question. A 757? IMPOSSIBLE!

Another possibility I never considered!   

Then this would mean that the tail fin belonged to the missile and not to an F-16 firing it.  A hypothesis that needs serious consideration!  (Damn!, btw)

Let us pause. Beyond the imagery, why would any rational person believe it could be a missile? - Because Donald Rumsfeld let it slip out during an interview; catching himself in one of his famous Freudian slips. Remember his Freudian view of draftees?

Yes, but he may have been referring to the airliner "as a missile" etc.  I let that one go.

Return to the security camera images. The security imagery shows a forward-traveling blast, which appears to be gaseous, more than conventionally explosive. The color of the flame is inconsistent with burning jet fuel - compare the images of the WTC.

I'm with him 100 percent on this one too.

As you view the Thierry Meyssan picture cited above, it clearly did little more than scorch the Pentagon wall. The blast might have come from the missile; possibly from something on the order of a propane tank on the ground. The damage to the Pentagon is clearly slight, relative to the magnitude of the fiery blast. The vast majority of the windows in the path of the blast are not broken. The explosion must have been very brief. In any event, it was clearly NOT 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, burning out of control. Again, no supporting seismic data.

Yes, here too.  WHite hot-explosion does not fit the story line.

Later an incredibly hot fire-ball is seen in many photographs. Possibly a gas main; perhaps a propane tank - it was not jet fuel burning. The flame color and propagation is wrong & the tattle-tale column of black smoke is missing.

The Pentagon security camera video images show a blast occurring in front of the wall – most likely a missile “proximity fuse.”

WOW!  iN OTHER WORDS A BIG DELIBERATE FLASH TO TEMPORARILY BLIND THE WITNESSES (SO THE REAL BOEING CAN FLY OVERHEAD)  IS WHAT i AM THINKING.

That blast imagery sets the stage for another conclusion. If that had been a B-757, the “pristine skin,” photographed on the Pentagon lawn, would have been destroyed, as it comes from the front end of a 757. Yet that “pristine skin” shows a shearing force in its damage, not compression or burn damage – of any type. IMPOSSIBLE!

These are all new and good reasons for considering the piece to be  planted fake evidence.  Why can't I ever meedt face to face with sensible and knowledgable people of good will like this in a room where we can talk freely?

In the various photograph collections of 9-11, many pictures display the white office walls to the left of the collapsed section. The walls are free of the smoke damage, soot & heat of the "intense" fire that supposedly took place within the building. The furniture is in good condition – in its original place. The floor-line is sawed off – inconsistent with a concrete “pour” (no ‘common’ supports for a “pour” design). The media would have the public buy into thousands of degrees melted the steel supports & collapsed the section. Heat rises, especially “thousands of degrees.” But, the upper offices are nearly untouched by any damage, whatsoever. IMPOSSIBLE!

This guy makes me feel like the mere Blockbuster video clerk that I am  -- The man's got the word!

The collections of the Pentagon photos also show something else - the "collapsed" floors, from the intense heat that "melted the aircraft" are obviously missing in the outer ring. The aircraft parts in the photographs are fully exposed, not buried under rubble. The parts are too few; clearly “salted,” in the parlance of miners. The site was clearly staged. The photos within the building, displaying the salted aircraft parts all too clearly show the missing debris of "collapsed" floors. The “thousands of degrees” would not be limited to a single ring-section. The “fuel” would not lag the projection of the “parts.”

I love this wise sonofabitch!!!!!!  I'm thanking God for him.

Those images pose another mystery. In later photos, the third floor offices to the left of the impact, behind the heliport control cab, are in full blaze. Imagine the adjacent exposed offices safe from fire, yet offices far down the hall & insulated from the roof by the fourth floor are in full blaze. Something is very seriously wrong, just in that imagery.

Duh.  Yep to that one too.

Beyond the Pentagon “hit,” there’s the curious business behind flight 93, in Pennsylvania – supposedly. A second crash site with no tail, no wings, minimum “parts” and a missing column of burning jet fuel. A second trans-continental flight with no children, hardly any passengers and no cargo. Far too much for “coincidence; IMPOSSIBLE!

Maybe 93 was the flight with no children  --  I've never looked into that one.

Most of this following information about Flight 93, FEMA etc. I have no special handle on to comment -- I found it informative.

I will say one thing about Flight 93.  The very same C-130 military air transport that overflew the crash at the Pentagon just 30 seconds after it occured, also flew to Pennsylvania and saw the wreckage of Flight 93 -- and this at a time when all aircraft were ordered down immediately  all over the country.

The associated flight 93 photographs show a partially burned tree line, inconsistent with approximately 10,000 gallons of jet fuel. The burn pattern is wrong; it’s symmetrical, not elongated. Again, the “smoke” photograph of the “crash” is that of ordnance, not jet fuel. Clearly, the blast comes from the ground, the “aircraft” was NOT shot down. Seismic data clearly demonstrates that, as well.

The “distribution” of the few parts and debris are inconsistent. Some parts were found miles away – in the wrong directions. The impact site and tree line fire suggest the direction of the alleged “aircraft” travel; still the distant parts and debris are in the wrong location – typically too far away, as well. But, clearly an ordnance explosion would so distribute those parts and debris.

The automatic response to all this goes to the fate of the actual aircraft & occupants – the real mystery, in all this. Raw guestimation is the only response available, for the moment. The planes and occupants are gone; in some fashion. Did the aircraft actually take off? Who can be certain? If they did, where did they go? What of the people?

While the “remote control” possibility is viably argued, there is no known suggestion which allows the aircraft to be taxied among other aircraft or taken off – particularly at a busy public airport. Just the required human communication would be on the edge of impossible. Once airborne, yes, remote control is possible. To be brief, reasonable probability is not contained in this scenario.

Clearly in the style of Hollywood, one must speculate that they did take off. Possibly they flew some portion of their flight. Then at some point, they turned off their transponders & flew to a closed Air Force Base, to be hidden in a hangar – probably during the “…land now!” chaos. Afterward – who knows? Are there approximately 110 people with a new identity, face and country of residence? None of the hijackers’ names are on passenger manifests. The aircraft have probably been disposed of, in some manner. Currently, only speculation is available.

Return to the phone call of Barbara Olson, wife of the Solicitor General. A few days after the event, he violates what had to be “national security” and blabs to CNN that his wife called him collect on an aircraft cell phone to provide details of the hijacking.

COLLECT?? You need a credit card to use those phones – and she reversed charges??? Whatever becomes of the associated debate, the assertion is ludicrous – yet, what did the world read in the news? Propaganda? PSYOPS? “Perception Control?” Whatever the label; it worked!

Return to Booker Elementary School. Andrew Card whispers in the ear of America’s President – “America is under Attack.” Great PR! What a fabulous choice of words at a time like that!

Imagine that no further details were provided to the President! Likewise, there was no demand for details, from him. There was no reaction from the supposed leader of the free world. Instead, the “President” sits there listening to a story of a goat! Ten minutes or thirty minutes, it makes no difference. Either Bush knew in advance – or he was being herded as a counterfeit President.

Presumably, in that time frame, there could be no known end to the “attack,” by the staff, yet they just let Bush sit there. Eliminating the impossible, one must conclude that the limits were, in fact, known. The entire staff couldn’t have been so incompetent as to remain calm, in the face of two terrorist strikes on the World Trade Center – with no indications that more were not on the way - somewhere. At least two “alleged” aircraft were still off course & presumed to be hijacked – yet they let the President just sit there. Just IMPOSSIBLE!

Certainly the Booker Elementary video will join the “Zapruder Film” in history.

Bush’s later claims as to having witnessed the aircraft strike on TV don’t hold up under elementary scrutiny. His statements (presumed reasoning) support other evidence of a serious a mental problem.

So, at Booker Elementary, with America under attack, they waited to take the President to Air Force One; thereafter flying him all over the country – incommunicado, for all intents & purposes. BUT, we’re told, the hijackers were believed to have the digital codes for Air Force One, along with the coded identity of Air Force One. What a frightening state of affairs! Air Force One was a target. So, in perfect logic, they took the President straight to Air Force One. No fighters are scrambled to protect the local cities, in the vicinity of Air Force One. IMPOSSIBLE!

Just imagine the hijackers being so arrogant that they would warn the White House that they had the codes. Killers don’t telegraph warnings! Imagine the White House being unable to trace the calls. Imagine the effort it would take to get through to the white house – for anything. All that on the hijacker’s way to paradise! IMPOSSIBLE!

Most importantly, imagine how such a tale would just disappear – even a bogus claim. No investigations, reprimands or prosecutions of those in charge of the codes or communication channels. Not even a statement that the “message” was bogus. IMPOSSIBLE!

AND, what became of those hijackers with the codes? They just disappeared in the myth of 9-11. Nobody went looking for them. All those Saudi names & nobody went to Saudi Arabia to track their “associates.” Many of the same names came forward and said, “Hey, I’m alive; what is this?” No one asked questions or clarified the issue.

In the damnable lies of history is the “slip” of Tom Kenney, the infamous FEMA urban Search & Rescue worker. According to his statement to Dan Rather, the FEMA team arrived the night before 9-11. Most convenient, if you’re planning a “9-11” and want the PR from it!

Certainly, some debate as to his statement to Dan Rather is available – until you realize that as a minimum, they would have gone to the hotel on the night of 9-11. RIGHT! On 9-11, a contracting Search & Rescue team demonstrated their heroics by going to the hotel. IMPOSSIBLE!

FEMA clearly inserted the team in anticipation of 9-11.

But, the most damnable piece of history is that of the American segment of the bin Laden family. In 1999, one of the brothers was identified by the CIA to Congress as facilitating the finances of al Qaeda, on Cyprus. In January of 2001, the White House killed an investigation into the family funding of al Qaeda. In May of 2001, family members successfully received Swiss citizenship.

Immediately after 9-11, the bin Laden members were assembled – some by private aircraft - & evacuated – via private aircraft. The FBI did the “exit interview.” The evacuation flight supposedly left from Boston - the airport originating the first WTC aircraft strike.

Think about it! The family was assembled by private aircraft and evacuated – BEFORE private aircraft could legally fly. Even if one slips the dates, private aircraft were still grounded, even if airliners could fly.

Imagine the Kamikaze plans of al Qaeda being known since 1995, with the discovery of “Project Bojinka” in the Philippines. The Kamikaze seriousness was demonstrated by the hijacking of flight of Air France Flight 8969. Still, the airline pilots were not advised. If they had been, 9-11 could never have happened – even in part.

But the most important aspect of this bin Laden “evacuation” is that it demonstrates the extreme degree of selectivity of the infamous bureaucratic “fog.” From at least as far back as 1995, the warnings of 9-11 were suppressed to the extreme that whistle-blowers were forcibly created out of the absolute refusal of the various agencies to respond to known & real threats. “Bureaucratic fog?” – IMPOSSIBLE!

In a nutshell -
 

1. The 9-11 warnings were there since at least 1995.
 

2. The known Kamikaze plan was demonstrated by Air France Flight 8969.
 

3. The airline pilots were NOT told - until after the Filipinos blew the lid off "Project Bojinka" that the US agencies damned well knew of the Kamikaze plans. THAT after key U.S. personalities passionately tried to pander – ‘no warnings.’
 

4. Professionals within the appropriate government agencies were hammered for trying to bring out what became 9-11. The investigators-turned-whistle-blowers continue to be hammered; after 9-11. They are not even a resource for 'what went wrong.'
 

5. The White House blocked an investigation into the bin Laden family funding of al Qaeda – in January of 2001.
 

6. With that 'killed' investigation in the immediate background, if the bin Laden family could be evacuated - by private aircraft - immediately after 9-11, the "bureaucratic fog" claim is a blatant farce. IMPOSSIBLE! Stop to think of the magnitude of coordination it would take to evacuate the “bin Laden” family, with that name on the tongue of every American. By any reasonable expectation – IMPOSSIBLE!

Yet, it happened!

Later, the bin Ladens’ were allowed to withdraw their investment & profits, when they were discovered to be part of the “Carlyle Group” investments, of the Elder Bush fame. There was no self-reporting by the group. There was no accountability demanded.

With the “impossible” eliminated - to a highly acceptable degree - what remains?

Don’t answer, just yet. Take a moment to breathe; there’s more which cries for rational examination.

Immediately America witnessed the trashing of the American Constitution under such legislation as the “Patriot Act” and the “Homeland Security Act.”

Clearly the Constitution was powerful enough to block the events of 9-11; even if they had been externally perpetrated – exclusively. The Constitution can dissuade and punish treason, it cannot force morality or patriotism upon determined traitors.

History is quite clear. The invasion of Afghanistan was planned well in advance of 9-11. An oil/gas pipeline was needed; Afghanistan was the only logical route. The so-called “Patriot Act” was pre-written on Clinton’s watch. The “Homeland Security Act” was written on Clinton’s watch – both versions. The Texas-scammed profiteering version made it past the trusting eyes of America - and into law. The brutal “Patriot Act II,” as it’s called, had Denny Hastert’s Ashcroft’s & Cheney’s name on it. It still sits in the wings – lurking. Just the PNAC documents betray Cheney’s role in the “New World Order” being foisted on an amazingly ignorant public.

So, in the final analysis of a reasonable and intelligent person; were the events of 9-11 - and subsequent - an al Qaeda terrorist operation? Certainly the al Qaeda were a “cutout” entity – a “patsy” – otherwise;

FOR INDEPENDENT REFERENCE:

BARBARA OLSON LIES HERE

FLIGHT 93 PHONY CALLS HERE

PHONY RADIO LOG HERE

PICTURE GALLERY HERE (this link dissapeared)

MORE PICTURES INCLUDING THE THIERRY MEYSSAN HERE
    [http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-four/french-911.htm]

WITNESS NONSENSE HERE